My Owl: A Passage from an artist's life abroad
And looking up at my owl always perched on the mantelpiece, I almost believed he winked his approval in answer to the inquiry he read in my eyes, as if to say "Yes I am tired of posing and disgusted with such low aims in art. Go and study the fine collections in this big city, copy the wonderful Turners, sketch on the Thames, paint anything but waste no more time buying bric-a-brac." "
Abigail May Alcott Nieriker
Introduction
My Owl is Abigail May Alcott Nieriker's charming
short story in which a taxidermized owl becomes a talisman for a
young artist trying to make her mark in the Parisian artworld. After
purchasing it in a Parisian bric-a-brac shop, the narrator paints a
still-life of it. Women artists of this period, like Nieriker, were
expected to be copyists and still life painters only. This stifled
their ambitions to become well-known artists because of the
Hierarchy of Genres
, which defined types of art
in levels of superiority. Still life and animal paintings were at the
bottom of the genre hierarchy (Butterfield-Rosen, 73-4), reducing the
chances of having them displayed at the most
prestigious exhibition forum
(Garb, 26), the
Paris Salon, which was the official exhibition of
the Beaux-Arts Academy. In My Owl, the
protagonist's owl painting is chosen for the Salon. The
contradiction of a decidedly low-brow genre painting being in a
significant exhibition places the owl at the forefront of the
narrative. Nieriker's choice of the owl deliberately evokes a
myriad of symbols, which this introduction will explore. The
owl's symbolism is open-ended, yet clearly represents the
speaker's artistic growth and inner psyche, and markedly
encapsulates Nieriker's sisterly relationship.
The taxidermized owl is unquestionably the tangible manifestation of
the speaker's psyche. Historically, owls have been
representations of introjection, projection, and other mental
phenomena (Fernandes), commonly appearing in dreams and other aspects
of the projector's subconscious. For example, the Ancient Greeks
believed owls were reflections of mythological wisdom, as seen in
Book XIV of the Iliad, where Hypnos, disguised as an
owl, is sent to turn the tide of the Trojan War (Homer). In a similar
way, Nieriker's owl turns the tide in the speaker's
artistic career, gaining attention by being displayed in the
notoriously unattainable Parisian Salon, where the painting queerly
hangs among the numberless nude subjects on the
walls
(Nieriker). Similarly to Homer's veiled deity, an old
folkloric Siberian legend portrays owls as good spirits who help and
guide people, especially travellers who wish to reach particular
destinations (Weinstein). This legend increases the significance of
the owl as a journeying companion in Nieriker's travel
narrative. Furthermore, in some areas of India, not only is the owl
seen as the Vahana, a divine vehicle in the Hindu religion for a
goddess to bring prosperity, but its meat itself is widely consumed
as a natural aphrodisiac (Weinstein), possibly reflected in the
owl's fate which catalyses the romance between the speaker and
the man who tries to save it.
The owl also establishes a dichotomy through vast parallelism in the
relationship between Abigail May Alcott Nieriker and her sister
Louisa May Alcott. In the text, the
speaker's taxidermized owl leads her to become a celebrated
woman artist by acting as a muse for her creativity, and also through
its humanistic offerings of guidance, for example when it tells her
to go and study the finer collections in this big
city
(Nieriker). The personification of the owl magnifies its
ability to express intelligence far beyond other
avian species
(Morris). This offering of counsel reflects
Nieriker's professional relationship with her sister. Louisa May
Alcott used the fame she received after publication of
Little Women to illuminate the work of Nieriker,
regardless of accreditation of work. This highlights a fascinating
duality between independence and reliance. The concluding scene of
My Owl is symbolic of finality, the ability to progress
from her interlinked state with the owl - still offering gratitude to
it yet allowing herself to evolve independently. This highlights
Nieriker's absence of freedom from Louisa's prominence in
the literary field, yet acknowledges her role in Nieriker's
journey to literary and artistic prominence, allowing Nieriker to
maintain her artistic independence.
Across a range of mythologies, the owl represents two sides of a
spectrum - either a sign of good fortune and wisdom, or connected to
poor health and witchcraft. In My Owl, Nieriker's
owl combines the positive connotations seen across the owl's
history with a representation much more personal to her (Lewis). As
previously explored, the owl brings good luck and wisdom, somewhat
enlightening the speaker's work. However, it also represents her
desire to stand out among the other female artists of the time, just
as the owl was discovered among other effects of
some artist
(Nieriker). The owl's role develops throughout
the story, going from representing Nieriker's desire to become
a successful artist, to being her muse, to being the mentor she
outgrows - essentially representing the removal of metaphorical
training wheels when the owl is 'killed'. The owl morphs
and changes as the speaker needs it to, representing each stage of an
artist's journey in each stage of the piece.
The symbolical interpretation of the owl is ambiguous, ultimately
foreshadowing the entirety of Nieriker's interdisciplinary
career. My Owl, similar to many of the other travel
narratives Nieriker wrote, was never published. Though a
New Criticism approach, where the interpretation
of the owl's symbolism through a structure of
interlocking motifs
(Frye, 82), expands the reader's
perception of the short story's literary merit, a consideration
of the autobiographical, cultural, and historical aspects presents a
feasible image of Nieriker in future academia. This rebirth of a
forgotten artist through literary criticism itself is a symbol of a
new era of remembering and reimagining female and interdisciplinary
artists. Bullington suggests that Nieriker's full artistic merit
did not flourish because of the culturally transitional period for
women, writing that historians and scholars largely forgot Nieriker
because she was a transitional woman (196). Despite being mostly
overlooked, transition ultimately 'makes the product' -
signifying an overarching transformational element that is prevalent
in the artwork of this period, just as the owl is the catalyst for
transformation in the life of the narrator.
Bibliography
- Bullington, Judy, "Inscriptions of Identity: May Alcott as Artist, Woman, and Myth", Prospects, Vol 27, , pp. 177–200
- Butterfield-Rosen, Emmelyn, "The Hierarchy of Genres and the Hierarchy of Life-Forms", Res, Vol 73-74, No 1, , pp. 77–93
- Frye, Northrop, "Second Essay: Ethical Criticism: Theory of Symbols", Anatomy of Criticism: Four Essays, Princeton University Press, , pp. 71-128
- Garb, Tamar. Sisters of the Brush: Women's Artistic Culture in Late Nineteenth-Century Paris, Yale University Press,
- Homer, Iliad, tr. Peter Jones, Penguin,
- Lewis, Deane, "Owls in Mythology and Culture", The Owl Pages, <https://www.owlpages.com/owls/articles.php?a=62> [accessed ]
- Morris, Desmond, Owl, Reaktion,
- Nieriker, Abigail May Alcott, "My Owl", An Artist's Holiday, , transcribed by Azelina Flint, [accessed ]
- Weinstein, Krystyna, The Owl in Art, Myth, and Legend, Grange Books,
- Wilson Fernandes, Julio, Jung Journal, Taylor & Francis, <https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/ujun20/16/1> [accessed ]